You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘decentralise’ tag.

This would have been a tweet but has snowballed beyond its 140 char limits into a definite POST.

Twitter has been offline for the last 40minutes, and I really wanted to blip / tweet / ping the world that I had been enjoying some things…


Have been enjoying the following without any guilt whatsoever :

– ‘religulous‘ doco last nite, very irreverend, very entertaining

– ‘Rereading Darwin‘ – still radical & relevant if we can grok eon sized time-spans

– web based interactive graphing calculator :

These are all awesome things, relying as they do on the advances that can be made when young people have freedom to think, to learn, have access to books and mentors and dont need to spend all their time either at war or gathering food or preparing shelter.


So that was going to be the basis of my tweet, but that has been subverted into a rant on why Twitter, and Facebook, and Foursquare and LinkedIn and… are fundamentally wrong, whereas the Internet is fundamentally right.

Twitter and Facebook etc. [or the social networking needs they serve] should really be implemented as a distributed system. Each person or a cluster of people would have a local server ‘node’, and it would route messages to other nodes and so on.

For popular tweets or status updates, or checkins or wall postings there would be thousands of copies of that tweet sitting on servers all over the globe. This redundancy is a good thing, there would be less chance that a single Denial of Service attack or plain old human error or of a hardware failure or a mass event taking down the whole system. It could also mean we have more control of our own data – we should ‘own’ the posts we make, and the company we pay [ in advertising or in cash ] would provide the plumbing for the routing of messages and content.

This kind of distributed agent approach requires us to grow psychologically beyond the need for a ‘Central Authority’.. in fact I think that the technology will eventually take us forward to better forms of government, security and privacy, in that they are less centralised, more efficiently optimised to the local and the global environment – fundamentally they will offer more freedom and may require more responsibility.